Renaissance Venice’s Politico-Economic Landscape
Renaissance Venice’s Politico-Economic Landscape |
For a maritime empire built on commercial transactions, trade was a principal
matter of domestic and foreign security in Renaissance Venice. For this reason,
the protection of the Eastern Mediterranean and the Adriatic was of primary
importance to the Venetian authorities.
This was one of the reasons why, throughout the sixteenth century, the Venetian Republic concentrated its maritime trade
activities on that part of the European continent. Consequently, the shores of
Western Europe played second fiddle to the Eastern coast of the Levant.
By then,
while the Portuguese had established a direct maritime route to Asia, transforming, thus, the landscape of Eurasian trade, the English, French, and Ottomans
joined in the competition for territorial expansion and, by extension, commercial
domination. At the same time, wars of religion for Catholic or Protestant dominance amplified this highly competitive international environment.
While
Venice managed to temporarily maintain control, anxiety over the potential
risks of losing the title of the commercial broker between the Levant, Asia, and
Europe led the Venetian government to proceed to a profound restructuring of
two interrelated practices: its foreign policy and, by extension, its economy.
The period between the 1470s and the 1570s has been characterized as an ‘iron
century’, due to Venice’s overreliance on military action for the defence of her
colonies in the Stato da Mar.
The gradual decrease of the Republic’s maritime
dominion instigated a more defensive attitude towards its foreign policy, as even
coeval observers of Venetian politics remarked.²⁰ This defensive stance resulted in
the need for continuous military protection and—more often than not—action,
which had political repercussions for the Republic’s diplomatic conduct and public funds, respectively.
Of particular significance were a slew of initiatives to
reinforce naval patrols in the Eastern Mediterranean and to refortify the Venetian
Levantine possessions, especially after Venice suffered further territorial losses
during the third Ottoman-Venetian war (1537–40).
The Venetian strongholds
of Corfu, Crete, and Cyprus, in particular, acted as bases for Venetian galleys
under the direction of the Capitano Generale da Mar, the commander-in-chief of
the Venetian fleet.
Intent on also policing ‘the Gulf ’, as the Adriatic Sea was
known amongst the Venetians, Venice performed off-the-cuff controls on foreign
armed vessels traversing it. In 1562, for instance, a Venetian commander seized an
armed galiot hailing from Ragusa (contemporary Dubrovnik)—a major trading
rival of Venice—warning the Ragusan authorities that, if they persisted in their
dogged efforts to arm more vessels, he would be forced to obliterate them.
Similarly, during the War of Cyprus, the Venetians arrested the crew of a ship
that was carrying weapons sent on behalf of Greek merchants to Coron, which at
the time was under Ottoman control. The reason for the arrest was to interrogate
the crew and captain about their cargo and mission.
The Venetians’ policing role
in the Adriatic was also accepted by the Ottomans, who saw it as part of the wider
web of reciprocal rights and duties that supported the idiosyncratic politicoeconomic relationship between the two empires.
The use of the word ‘politico-economic’ is not fortuitous here, since the Venetians could not see a clear-cut distinction between politics and commerce, as
political affairs could affect one’s business and livelihood, and commercial pursuits
could have political repercussions and, by extension, diplomatic implications.
This is one of the reasons why, as will become increasingly apparent throughout
this book, the Venetians became crafty adversaries of the Ottomans, aiming to
please and placate them by supplying them with intelligence on European affairs
and offering them a panoply of lavish gifts, especially during the politically tempestuous sixteenth century.
Ensuring that the Sultan would not impose impeding commercial restrictions on Venice was one of the major politico-economic
objectives of the Venetian government. It is for this reason that Diego Hurtado
de Mendoza, the Spanish ambassador to Venice between 1539 and 1546, grumbled
that the Venetians preferred to safeguard their economic interests in the Levant to
challenging the Ottomans in that region.
As he graphically reported in a missive
to Charles V, ‘of all the world powers, the Venetians feared only Charles and
the Turks, respected only Charles, and wished everyone else ill’. Indeed, while
the Ottoman Empire posed an unremitting threat to the Venetian state’s Levantine
possessions, it was simultaneously one of Venice’s primary trading partners,
absorbing large quantities of Venice’s silk and wool, and, by extension, securing
the employment of tens of thousands of craftsmen who formed part of the Venetian
textile industries, especially in the second half of the sixteenth century.
This interdependent relationship that Venice had developed with the Ottoman
Empire meant that the Venetians were amongst the first to receive news reaching
the Mediterranean from the East, to the dismay of the Spanish, who looked at the
peculiar relationship between the Venetian and Ottoman empires with a jaundiced eye.
Passing through the Dominante’s possessions in the Aegean and
Ionian seas, which were used ‘as observatories and relays for the transmission of
maritime news’, and also via the Venetian strongholds across the Balkans and
the Adriatic, information arrived in Venice before it reached other parts of the
European continent.
Consequently, Venice became the central terrain of encounters between foreign emissaries hungry for news. The social and diplomatic whirl
that ensued from the frenzy of daily updates reaching the lagoon turned Venice
into a boisterous information centre where news became as purchasable a
commodity as silk and spices.
Post a Comment